Hijacking the Language of Liberation & Being Kind
“People have a hard time admitting they were colonized by the discourse of pedocriminals,” said Muriel Salmona in a 2018 Atlantic article
“People have a hard time admitting they were colonized by the discourse of pedocriminals,” stated Muriel Salmona, a psychiatrist specializing in the care of victims of violence, in a 2018 Atlantic article1.
We've been at the "too far" point, where exploitation of progressive language—the language of liberation—raises massive red flags. From the 1960s to 1980s, pedophile advocacy groups in Europe infiltrated leftist movements using this language. These days, this language is also combined with what I call "Be Kindism," suspending your own discernment or just going along for fear of not appearing to be a kind person. I think it’s more of the latter.
In Britain during the 1970s, the Paedophile Information Exchange aligned with the NCCL to lower the age of consent; in Germany during the 1960s to 1980s, predatory men tied to Tageszeitung and Helmut Kentler’s foster program framed pedophilia as progressive; and in France during the 1970s, so-called intellectuals Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Simone de Beauvoir, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Louis Althusser backed repealing the age of consent.2
A 2022 Reduxx in-depth investigation by Genevieve Gluck revealed that the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) collaborated with influential academics Dr. Thomas W. Johnson, Professor Emeritus at the University of California-Chico, and Dr. Richard J. Wassersug of the University of British Columbia, both long-time members and top administrators of the Eunuch Archive, a fetish forum hosting thousands of stories eroticizing child castration and sadomasochistic abuse. Johnson, using the handle “Jesus,” consulted on WPATH’s 2021 draft Standards of Care to include “eunuch” as a gender identity, while Wassersug, known as “EunuchUnique,” moderated the forum’s content. This disturbing connection, corroborated by Reduxx’s evidence, strongly suggests that predatory men aroused by prepubescent children are influencing elements of the “trans” agenda and lobby.3
It is exceptionally plausible that the push for puberty blockers, marketed with the euphemistic term "gender-affirming care," is likely influenced by ulterior motives by some individuals. Puberty is the point where men aroused by prepubescent children are no longer aroused. What group of men would benefit from legal adults with the bodies of children?
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/02/how-paedophiles-infiltrated-the-left-harriet-harman-patricia-hewitt
https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html
Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/feb/24/jonhenley
Archive: https://archive.is/J7Jh1
Also see first footnote.
https://reduxx.info/top-trans-medical-association-collaborated-with-castration-child-abuse-fetishists/
Video of Tom Johnson, an academic who advised the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) on "eunuch gender identity" stating in 2014 that girls and young women can identify as eunuchs - as castrated males.: https://x.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1646584221316837376